Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMkanganwi, K.G.
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-01T08:46:18Z
dc.date.available2006-09-01T08:46:18Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citationMkanganwi, K.G.'' ‘Shona (derivational) Morphology: An Observation in Search of a Theory.'' Zambezia 29.2 (2002): 174-190.en
dc.identifier.issn0379-0622
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10646/504
dc.description.abstractThis article concerns a traditional analysis of Shona morphology, which is based on a (positional) classification of affix morphemes into prefixes and suffixes. It posits the hypothesis that the distinction supports the other traditional (but more controversial) distinction between inflectional and derivational affixes, a distinction which is seen by many scholars in the literature as not being a sharp one. What, however, seems to be the case for Shona, and possibly for Bantu as well, is that the distinction is in fact quite sharp, and is based on the simple positional distinction between prefix and suffix. All Shona affixes fall into three classes, namely inflectional, derivational and clitical. The data seems to support the hypothesis.en
dc.format.extent77879 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Zimbabwe Publicationsen
dc.subjectShonaen
dc.subjectmorphologyen
dc.title‘Shona (derivational) Morphology: An Observation in Search of a Theory’en
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record