Comparison of GARP and Maxent in modelling the geographic distribution of Bacillus anthracis in Zimbabwe
Date
2017-08Author
Chikerema, Silvester M.
Gwitira, Isaiah
Murwira, Amon
Pfukenyi, Davies M.
Matope, Gift
Type
ArticleMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
A number of presence-only models can be used in the prediction of the geographic distribution of diseases
and/or their vectors. The predictive performance of these models differs depending on a number of factors but
primarily the modeled species’ ecological traits. In this study, the performance of GARP and Maxent, two of the
most commonly used modelling methods were compared in predicting presence and absence of anthrax in
Zimbabwe using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Kappa statistic and the Jaccard coefficient as measures of
model performance. The results showed that GARP had higher accuracy than Maxent (GARP = 0.70, Maxent =
0.67). Both methods had equal sensitivity (sensitivity = 0.71), but GARP had higher specificity (GARP=0.70,
Maxent=0.67). Both Kappa and the Jaccard coefficient were also higher for GARP (0.335; 0.36) than for
Maxent (0.295; 0.34). The results imply that GARP has superior performance over Maxent and is recommended
for modelling species habitat suitability.
Additional Citation Information
Chikerema, S. M., Gwitira, I., Murwira, A., Pfukenyi, D. M., & Matope, G. (2017). Comparison of GARP and Maxent in modelling the geographic distribution of Bacillus anthracis in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Veterinary Journal 35 (1), 1-6.Publisher
Zimbabwe Veterinary Journal