dc.contributor.author | Gwisai, Munyaradzi | |
dc.contributor.author | Matsikidze, Rodgers | |
dc.contributor.author | Mucheche, Caleb | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-14T09:52:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-14T09:52:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gwisai, M., Matsikidze, R & Mucheche, C. (2019). Labour rights under Zimbabwe’s new Constitution: The right to be paid a fair and reasonable wage. University of Zimbabwe Law Journal, 2(1), 204-231. | en_ZW |
dc.identifier.issn | 2617-2046 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10646/3912 | |
dc.description.abstract | Although the philosophical basis of the Labour Act3 is pluralist, with
the Act providing that its “purpose is to advance social justice and
democracy in the workplace,”4 the regime covering wages has been
decidedly unitarist. Hitherto neither statutes nor common law had
prescribed the quantum of wages payable to employees. This, despite
perhaps one of the most rallying demands of labour in the last two
decades being the demand for a Poverty Datum Line-linked living
wage. This is understandable, when one considers that by 2011, nearly
93 per cent of formal sector employees were earning wages less than
the Total Consumption Poverty Line (TCPL), the generally accepted
measurement of poverty.5 Thus, for most workers, a living wage
remains a mirage. They are mired in dire and debilitating poverty. | en_ZW |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZW |
dc.publisher | University of Zimbabwe | en_ZW |
dc.subject | Labour rights | en_ZW |
dc.subject | Labour Act | en_ZW |
dc.subject | Living wage | en_ZW |
dc.subject | Labour court | en_ZW |
dc.subject | International Labour Organisation (ILO) | en_ZW |
dc.subject | Reasonable wage | en_ZW |
dc.title | Labour rights under Zimbabwe’s new Constitution: The right to be paid a fair and reasonable wage | en_ZW |
dc.type | Article | en_ZW |