Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMashoko, Chaka
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T09:31:22Z
dc.date.available2020-10-14T09:31:22Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationMashoko, C. (2018). Judicial appointment in Zimbabwe: defining the concept of “fit and proper person.” University of Zimbabwe Law Journal, 1(1), 101-116.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2617-2046
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10646/3905
dc.description.abstractAs in other progressive jurisdictions, the Constitution of Zimbabwe provides that a person to be appointed to the office of a judge must be “a fit and proper person” although this concept is not defined in the Constitution. No guidance is given by the Constitution to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) in determining what criteria to apply in selecting candidates and to ensure that the candidate for judicial appointment or promotion has all the necessary attributes.Constitutions have numerous open-ended definitions to allow the legislature and other subordinates to creatively formulate a comprehensive meaning of the open-ended terms. This allows for flexibility rather than rigidity in interpretation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_ZWen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Zimbabween_US
dc.subjectJudicial appointmenten_US
dc.subjectLegal practitioneren_US
dc.subjectAttorneyen_US
dc.subjectJudicial authorityen_US
dc.subjectConstitution of Zimbabween_US
dc.titleJudicial appointment in Zimbabwe: defining the concept of “fit and proper person.”en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record