Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaja, Innocent
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T09:29:04Z
dc.date.available2020-10-14T09:29:04Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationMaja, I. (2018). Limitation of human rights in International Law and the Zimbabwean constitution. University of Zimbabwe Law Journal, 1(1), 117-134.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2617-2046
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10646/3904
dc.description.abstractHuman rights contained in international treaties, regional treaties and national constitutions are generally not absolute but are often qualified and subject to reasonable restrictions.Currie and de Waal argues that ‘constitutional rights and freedoms are not absolute. They have boundaries set by the rights of others and by important social concerns such as public order, safety, health and democratic values.’ This essentially means that not all infringement of rights is unconstitutional.Rights can be limited or justifiably infringed if the reason for infringement is justifiable ‘in an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom.en_US
dc.language.isoen_ZWen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Zimbabween_US
dc.subjectHuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectInternational Human Rightsen_US
dc.subjectConstitution of Zimbabween_US
dc.subjectLimitation of rightsen_US
dc.subjectLaw of general applicationen_US
dc.subjectTreatiesen_US
dc.titleLimitation of human rights in International Law and the Zimbabwean constitution.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.authoremailinnocent@majasque.comen_US
dc.contributor.authoremailimaja@ibj.orgen_US
dc.contributor.authoremailimaja@law.uz.ac.zwen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record