Should provocation be a partial defence to intentional killing of an adulterous spouse?
Abstract
During interaction in society, people often provoke others by
their conduct or their words. There would be chaos and
disorder in the society if people responded with violence when
subjected to every minor provocation they may encounter.
The underlying policy in relation to this defence is therefore
that, generally, the law expects people to exercise restraint
and self-control when provoked and to refrain from engaging
in violence against the provokers. The defence of provocation
is thus a limited defence in Zimbabwe. For crimes other than
murder, provocation does not operate as a defence but can
only be a mitigatory factor. For murder, provocation will at
most be a partial defence. Section 239 of the Criminal Law
(Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] codified the
common law two stage approach to provocation as a defence
to a charge of murder.
Additional Citation Information
Feltoe, G.(2018). Should provocation be a partial defence to intentional killing of an adulterous spouse? University of Zimbabwe Law Journal, 1(1). 232-238.Publisher
University of Zimbabwe
Subject
ProvocationCriminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act
Criminal Law
Adultery
Mitigatory factor