Show simple item record

dc.creatorHlatshwayo, B.
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-07T10:06:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T10:55:07Z
dc.date.available2015-07-07T10:06:53Z
dc.date.available2015-12-08T10:55:07Z
dc.date.created2015-07-07T10:06:53Z
dc.date.issued1991
dc.identifierHlatshwayo, B. (1991) Judicial Activism and Development: Warning Signals from Zimbabwe, ZLRev. vol. 9-10 (pp.4-14) UZ, Mt. Pleasant, Harare:
dc.identifierhttp://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/6463
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10646/2147
dc.description.abstractIn January, 1991 the Zimbabwe government was on the brink of enacting into law a fundamental amendment to the country’s constitution: the Eleventh Amendment1. This amendment would have the effect of denying the courts the power to declarers unconstitutional, on the basis that the compensation provided by that law is not fair, an enabling Act fixing the amount of compensation payable and the period within which it had to be paid, for land compulsorily acquired by the state from individuals2. There was disquiet in some quarters and quiet; expectation in others.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Zimbabwe ( UZ.)
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.rightsUniversity of Zimbabwe (UZ).
dc.subjectPolitics and Power
dc.subjectRights
dc.titleJudicial Activism and Development: Warning Signals from Zimbabwe
dc.typeArticle


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record