Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDhliwayo, Solomon
dc.contributor.authorMatope, Gift
dc.contributor.authorMarabini, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorDutlow, Keith
dc.contributor.authorPfukenyi, Davies M
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-20T07:52:06Z
dc.date.available2014-10-20T07:52:06Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationDhliwayo, S., Matope, G., Marabini, L., Dutlow, K. & Pfukenyi, D.M., 2012, ‘Seroprevalence of leptospirosis in dogs in urban Harare and selected rural communities in Zimbabwe’, Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 79(1), Art. #447, 6 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ ojvr.v79i1.447en_US
dc.identifier.issn0030-2465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10646/1315
dc.description.abstractA cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate seroprevalence of canine leptospirosis in urban Harare and five selected rural communities in Zimbabwe and to assess public awareness of the disease. Sera from randomly selected dogs were tested for antibodies to the serovars Canicola, Grippotyphosa, Icterohaemorrhagiae and Pomona of Leptospira interrogans using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clinical chemistry was performed on all seropositive and selected seronegative sera to screen for hepatic and renal insufficiency. A questionnairebased survey was conducted in Harare to assess dog owners’ awareness of leptospirosis and other zoonoses. Overall, 15.6% of sera samples tested (39 out of 250; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.0% – 20.2%) were positive for leptospiral antibodies. A significantly higher (p < 0.05) seroprevalence was recorded in urban dogs than in rural dogs (25% vs. 11.2%). No significant difference in seroprevalence was observed amongst dogs from different rural communities or between sexes of dogs. There was a significant association between seropositivity and hepatic and/or renal insufficiency (p < 0.01), with dogs having hepatic and/or renal insufficiency being approximately twice as likely to be seropositive (relative risk = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.3–3.0). Of the dog owners, 78.8% (119/151) were aware of zoonoses. Except for rabies (92.4%), awareness of leptospirosis (5.0%) and other zoonoses amongst these owners was low. This study showed that leptospirosis was present and represented a risk to dogs from urban Harare and the selected rural communities in Zimbabwe. Availing training programmes for dog owners would be beneficial in improving disease control and reducing the public health risk of pet zoonoses.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCouncil for Assisting Refugee Academics (CARA), the AWARE Trust of Zimbabwe and the University of Zimbabwe Research Board Grant no. RB/103/11en_US
dc.language.isoen_ZWen_US
dc.publisherAOSIS OpenJournalsen_US
dc.subjectpet zoonosesen_US
dc.subjectcanine leptospirosisen_US
dc.subjectbacterial zoonosisen_US
dc.subjectdogsen_US
dc.titleSeroprevalence of leptospirosis in dogs in urban Harare and selected rural communities in Zimbabween_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record