Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMotsi, T.R
dc.contributor.authorTichiwangana, S.C
dc.contributor.authorMatope, G
dc.contributor.authorMukarati, N. L.
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-09T07:25:22Z
dc.date.available2014-09-09T07:25:22Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-18
dc.identifier.citationMotsi, T.R., Tichiwangana, S.C., Matope, G. & Mukarati, N.L., 2013, ‘A serological survey of brucellosis in wild ungulate species from five game parks in Zimbabwe’, Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 80(1), Art. #586, 4 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ ojvr.v80i1.586en_US
dc.identifier.issn2219-0635
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10646/1300
dc.description.abstractA retrospective serosurvey was carried out between 2009 and 2012 to detect antibodies to Brucella spp. in free-ranging African wildlife ungulates from five selected game parks in Zimbabwe. Samples were drawn from wildlife-livestock interface and non-interface areas in Zimbabwe. A total of 270 serum samples from four different species, namely African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) (n =106), impala (Aepyceros melampus) (n = 72), black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) (n = 45) and white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) (n = 47), were tested. The percentage of positive samples was 17.0% in buffalo (18/106; 95% CI: 9.72% – 24.1%) and 1.4% in impala (1/72; 95% CI: 0% – 4.2%). No antibodies to Brucella spp. were detected in the two rhinoceros species. The difference in the percentage of seropositive cases between buffalo and impala was significant (p < 0.05). Seropositivity to Brucella spp. was higher (19.1%) in adult buffalo compared with juveniles and sub-adults younger than six years (5.9%). Further, seropositivity was marginally higher (20.4%) in animals from wildlife-livestock interface areas than in those from non-interface areas (13.45%; OR = 1.45) although the difference was not statistically significant. The study showed that brucellosis could be more widespread in buffalo and may circulate in this species independently in the absence of contact with cattle, whilst rhinoceros may be considered less susceptible to brucellosis. The role of the wildlifelivestock interface in the epidemiology of brucellosis in wildlife and livestock is probably overstated but needs to be explored further.en_US
dc.language.isoen_ZWen_US
dc.publisherAOSIS OpenJournalsen_US
dc.subjectwild ungulate speciesen_US
dc.subjectgame parksen_US
dc.subjectbovine brucellosisen_US
dc.subjectwildlifeen_US
dc.subjectanimal diseasesen_US
dc.subjectprotected national parksen_US
dc.titleA serological survey of brucellosis in wild ungulate species from five game parks in Zimbabween_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record