• Login
    View Item 
    •   UZ eScholar Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Faculty of Law ETDs
    • Faculty of Law e-Theses Collection
    • View Item
    •   UZ eScholar Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Faculty of Law ETDs
    • Faculty of Law e-Theses Collection
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The civil procedure in the Magistrates Court of Zimbabwe: A denial of justice to self actors?

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Matsikidze_The_civil_procedure_in_the_Magistrate_Court_of_Zimbabwe.pdf (2.124Mb)
    Date
    2016-04
    Author
    Matsikidze, Rodgers
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    This study investigates the challenges self actors, known in other jurisdiction as self representing litigants, when bringing their cases before the Magistrates Court or defending themselves in the Magistrates Court. In Zimbabwe the Magistrates Court is the only general court that has civil, customary and criminal jurisdiction that is situated in every province. It is the only formal court that is geographically accessible to self actors as after it is the superior court known as the High Court of Zimbabwe which is a court of first instance and appellate jurisdiction and is only situated in Harare and Bulawayo. There are not many self actors who approach this court because of very complex court procedures and geographical inaccessibility. Hence the Magistrates Court becomes the only formal legal channel through which all those self actors who thirst for justice bring up their cases or defend their rights. To realize their rights or protect the same the self actors would have to do it in the Magistrates Court. The majorities of self actors do not choose to be self actors but rather do it alone because they cannot afford the cost of hiring a legal practitioner. The majority of studies on access to justice focus largely on the provision of legal aid to self actors but in practice very few are able to access the legal aid and end up representing self. The question of whether the court procedure in the Magistrates Court provides the required access to justice to these self actors has not been interrogated despite the fact that access to justice is a fundamental human right and a right that unlocks all other rights. A self actor can only successfully bring his/her case before a court of law or defend herself/himself, if he or she understands how to navigate the civil procedure in the Magistrates Court. Thus it becomes pertinent to investigate and establish the problematic aspects of the civil procedure to self actors as well as recommend solutions that are capable of implementation in light of the socio-economic environment of Zimbabwe. The need to maintain a degree of formality within the courts that brings sanity and certainty to users (represented or not) must also be taken into account.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10646/2594
    Additional Citation Information
    Matsikidze, R. (2014). The civil procedure in magistrate courts of Zimbabwe: A denial of justice to self actors? (Unpublished Masters thesis), University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
    Publisher
    University of Zimbabwe
    Subject
    Magistrate Court in Zimbabwe
    self actors
    self representing litigants
    Collections
    • Faculty of Law e-Theses Collection [119]

    University of Zimbabwe: Educating To Change Lives!
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2020  DuraSpace | Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of UZ eScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

    University of Zimbabwe: Educating To Change Lives!
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2020  DuraSpace | Contact Us | Send Feedback