Show simple item record

dc.creatorSekhonyana, Eddie
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-13T08:23:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T10:55:24Z
dc.date.available2015-07-13T08:23:55Z
dc.date.available2015-12-08T10:55:24Z
dc.date.created2015-07-13T08:23:55Z
dc.date.issued1991
dc.identifierSekhonyana, E. (1991) The Propriety of Administration of Oaths and Affirmations by Prosecutors in the Magistrates Courts in Zimbabwe, ZLRev. vol. 9-10, (pp. 72-81), UZ, mt. Pleasant, Harare: Faculty of Law.
dc.identifierhttp://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/6553
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10646/2208
dc.description.abstractThis article was mainly inspired by rather an anomalous but rampant practice by the magistrates in Zimbabwe of requiring prosecutors appearing before them to swear in witnesses. This practice is common at the Rotten Row and Tredgold magistrates courts. The position taken in this paper is that the prosecutor is unsuitable to administer oaths to witnesses appearing in his court simply because he has an interest in the outcome of the case. Swearing in of witnesses before leading evidence is part and parcel of the criminal justice system of many civilised countries including Zimbabwe.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Zimbabwe (UZ)
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.rightsUniversity of Zimbabwe (UZ)
dc.subjectGovernance
dc.subjectPolitics and Power
dc.subjectRights
dc.titleThe Propriety of Administration of Oaths and Affirmations by Prosecutors in the Magistrates Courts in Zimbabwe
dc.typeArticle


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record