Show simple item record

dc.creatorBlackie, Malcolm J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-29T14:45:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T10:53:06Z
dc.date.available2014-09-29T14:45:43Z
dc.date.available2015-12-08T10:53:06Z
dc.date.created2014-09-29T14:45:43Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-29
dc.identifierhttp://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/4553
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10646/1511
dc.description.abstractThe thesis of the paper is that African smallholders, while numerically dominant in the agricultural systems of the continent, have been largely ignored in the evolution of agricultural policy. With respect to the provision of delivery systems, governments have typically favored the establishment of parastatal boards. The evidence suggests1 that these boards have performed poorly.’ Case studies of parastatals in Zimbabwe are used to illustrate how, in terms of’ delivery systems, it is necessary to mobilize both producer initiative' and government resource's in order to devise, systems -..that.’ effectively and efficiently. serve the:'smallholder producer. The argument is developed: that/the effectiveness- of agricultural delivery systems can be substantially improved by changing.the role of the state in their operation from that of manager to that of referee.
dc.languageen
dc.relationDepartment of Land Management Working Paper;1/84
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.rightsUniversity of Zimbabwe.
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.titleRestructuring Agricultural Delivery Systems In Sub-Saharan Africa : A Case Study Of Zimbabwe
dc.typeSeries paper (non-IDS)


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record