Show simple item record

dc.creatorDzingirai, Vupenyu.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-03T10:50:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T10:53:04Z
dc.date.available2014-10-03T10:50:35Z
dc.date.available2015-12-08T10:53:04Z
dc.date.created2014-10-03T10:50:35Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-03
dc.identifierhttp://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/4638
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10646/1489
dc.description.abstractToday it is generally accepted that wildlife can be fully conserved by involving local' people in its management (Bromley and Carnea, 1989: 10; Berkes and Farvar, 1989: 3). The argument is that benefits to the people who live with the resources will give value to wildlife. Local people will also start to regard wildlife as their own and, because of that, will stop poaching them. (Murpnree, 1991; Makombe, 1993).
dc.languageen
dc.relationCASS Occasional Paper - NRM Series;1995;
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
dc.rightsUniversity of Zimbabwe
dc.subjectEnvironment
dc.subjectParticipation
dc.subjectRural Development
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.title'Take Back Your Campfire’: A Study of Local Level Perceptions to Electric Fencing in the Framework of Binga’s Campfire Programme
dc.typeSeries paper (non-IDS)


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record