Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10646/701
Title: Workers' participation, collective bargaining and tripartism in formulation of employments policies in Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe
Authors: Sibanda, Arnold Elson
Keywords: labour relations
industrial relations
collective bargaining
employment policies
Issue Date: 1991
Publisher: Zimbabwe Institute of Development Studies
Citation: Sibanda, Arnold Eison (1991). Workers' participation, collective bargaining and tripartism in formulation of employments policies in Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: Zimbabwe Institute of Development Studies, 26p.
Series/Report no.: Discussion paper;8
Abstract: Brief Historical Background to the Development and Organisation of the Labour Movement in Tanganyika In Tanganyika, the penetration by German capital led to the dispossession of peasants of their land. The fertile upland areas were carved out into plantations on which the Germans periodically forced African peasants to work. It was after World War II that African peasants were transformed into a stabilized wage labour force from an unstabilized mass of semi-proletarians who were mainly "target workers" (Sibanda in Chevo and Sibanda, 1984: 4). This was due to the accelerated development of capitalist economic forms in the colony. Mihyo says: .... between 1920 and 1930, the economy witnessed a shift from predominantly peasant production to a plantation economy with the introduction of cash crops There thus emerged a people employed on plantations - mainly sisal, coffee, rubber and groundnuts - forming a pioneer labour force which increased as the plantation economy expanded (Damachi et al\ eds. 1979: 240). By 1931 the workforce in Tanganyika, comprising all sectors: Government, plantation agriculture, mining, transport (rail and road), simple manufacturing, building and construction and commerce, etc. reached a total of 455 395 (Sibanda, ibid6). This expansion and the accompanying problems between labour and capital spurred the colonial administration to evolve a machinery to regulate industrial relations. A Manpower Commission was set up in 1951 to look into labour conditions and recommend systems of payment and means to increase efficiency and productivity. The Report of the Commission cited low wages and lack of incentives (food and leave) as causes of low productivity (Damachi, ibid., 242). The outcome was the passing of two laws, the Minimum Wages, Terms and Conditions of Employment Act, 1953 and the Employment Ordinance of 1955: The former Act set up minimum wages and collective bargaining from plant level with 'works committees' to 'joint consultation councils' of employers and employees. Thus the institutional framework of works committees and works councils are products of workers' struggles and intervention of the state long before Independence (Sibanda, ibid., 8). The latter Act set out minimum standards of employment including medical examination and facilities, control of juvenile labour, provision of food, housing, etc. The trade unions had come into existence spontaneously between 1947 and 1950 but were then repressed by the colonial state. By 1953, they were recognised both de facto and de jure with a machinery for their regulation and control in place. A Trade Union Ordinance was passed, outlining the procedure of forming and registering unions and providing minimum standards in their functioning, especially as regards their finances and their participation in collective bargaining (Mihyo in Damachi, ibid.).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10646/701
Appears in Collections:IDS Research, Discussion and Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
dp8- 77054.pdf3.96 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.