Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10646/4547
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChikerema, Silvester M.-
dc.contributor.authorGwitira, Isaiah-
dc.contributor.authorMurwira, Amon-
dc.contributor.authorPfukenyi, Davies M.-
dc.contributor.authorMatope, Gift-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T07:28:10Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-23T07:28:10Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.citationChikerema, S. M., Gwitira, I., Murwira, A., Pfukenyi, D. M., & Matope, G. (2017). Comparison of GARP and Maxent in modelling the geographic distribution of Bacillus anthracis in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Veterinary Journal 35 (1), 1-6.en_ZW
dc.identifier.issn1016-1511-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10646/4547-
dc.description.abstractA number of presence-only models can be used in the prediction of the geographic distribution of diseases and/or their vectors. The predictive performance of these models differs depending on a number of factors but primarily the modeled species’ ecological traits. In this study, the performance of GARP and Maxent, two of the most commonly used modelling methods were compared in predicting presence and absence of anthrax in Zimbabwe using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Kappa statistic and the Jaccard coefficient as measures of model performance. The results showed that GARP had higher accuracy than Maxent (GARP = 0.70, Maxent = 0.67). Both methods had equal sensitivity (sensitivity = 0.71), but GARP had higher specificity (GARP=0.70, Maxent=0.67). Both Kappa and the Jaccard coefficient were also higher for GARP (0.335; 0.36) than for Maxent (0.295; 0.34). The results imply that GARP has superior performance over Maxent and is recommended for modelling species habitat suitability.en_ZW
dc.publisherZimbabwe Veterinary Journalen_ZW
dc.subjectAnthrax outbreaksen_ZW
dc.subjectDisease vectorsen_ZW
dc.subjectAnthrax occurrencesen_ZW
dc.subjectDisease surveillanceen_ZW
dc.titleComparison of GARP and Maxent in modelling the geographic distribution of Bacillus anthracis in Zimbabween_ZW
dc.typeArticleen_ZW
dc.contributor.authoremailschikerema@vet.uz.ac.zwen_US
Appears in Collections:Clinical Vet Staff Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pfukenyi_2017_Anthrax_Comparisons_GARP_Maxent_ZVJ.pdf178.44 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.