Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10646/3905
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMashoko, Chaka-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T09:31:22Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-14T09:31:22Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationMashoko, C. (2018). Judicial appointment in Zimbabwe: defining the concept of “fit and proper person.” University of Zimbabwe Law Journal, 1(1), 101-116.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2617-2046-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10646/3905-
dc.description.abstractAs in other progressive jurisdictions, the Constitution of Zimbabwe provides that a person to be appointed to the office of a judge must be “a fit and proper person” although this concept is not defined in the Constitution. No guidance is given by the Constitution to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) in determining what criteria to apply in selecting candidates and to ensure that the candidate for judicial appointment or promotion has all the necessary attributes.Constitutions have numerous open-ended definitions to allow the legislature and other subordinates to creatively formulate a comprehensive meaning of the open-ended terms. This allows for flexibility rather than rigidity in interpretation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_ZWen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Zimbabween_US
dc.subjectJudicial appointmenten_US
dc.subjectLegal practitioneren_US
dc.subjectAttorneyen_US
dc.subjectJudicial authorityen_US
dc.subjectConstitution of Zimbabween_US
dc.titleJudicial appointment in Zimbabwe: defining the concept of “fit and proper person.”en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Legal Postgraduate Programmes Staff Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mashoko_Judicial_Appointment_In_Zimbabwe.pdfMain article61.83 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.